Why Pain Is Not Always Where the Problem Is

It is a commonly held belief — and an understandable one — that pain occurs at the site of the problem. If the knee hurts, something must be wrong with the knee. If the shoulder aches, the shoulder must be injured. This assumption is intuitive but biologically incomplete. Pain is produced by the brain as an interpretation of incoming signals from the body and the environment, and the location the brain assigns to the experience of pain does not always correspond to the anatomical location of its source.

This is not a quirk or a failure of the system; it is a reflection of the complexity of neural pain processing. Multiple biological mechanisms can cause pain to be perceived at a site distant from, or in addition to, its actual origin — and several of these mechanisms can cause pain to appear to shift, travel, or migrate over time.

Referred Pain Patterns

The most clinically significant cause of pain perceived away from its source is referred pain — a well-documented neurophysiological phenomenon in which stimulation of a structure produces pain experienced at a predictable, remote location. The anatomical basis lies in the convergence of sensory input from different structures onto shared second-order neurones in the spinal dorsal horn. When input from a deep somatic structure — a muscle, joint capsule, or intervertebral disc — arrives at dorsal horn neurones that also receive input from surface tissues, the brain may misattribute the source of the signal to the surface structure rather than the deep one.

Myofascial trigger points are a major source of referred pain in musculoskeletal practice. The upper trapezius muscle, for example, refers pain up the lateral neck and over the temple; the infraspinatus refers into the anterior shoulder and upper arm; the gluteus minimus produces buttock and lateral thigh pain mimicking sciatica. As trigger points develop, resolve, or become active in different muscles — driven by changing loading patterns, posture, or activity — the location of referred pain shifts correspondingly, giving the impression that pain is moving.

Compensatory Loading and Secondary Pain Sites

When one region of the body is injured or painful, normal movement patterns are altered. Muscles neighbouring an injured structure are recruited at higher intensity to protect it; adjacent joints take on redistributed load; gait and posture are modified to reduce input to the painful area. These compensatory strategies are adaptive in the short term but, when sustained over weeks or months, create secondary overload in structures that were not originally injured.

A person with a painful right knee, for example, will typically offload that limb, increasing mechanical demand on the left hip, the lumbar spine, and the right hip and ankle. Over time, pain may develop in these secondary sites — not because anything is intrinsically wrong with them, but because they have been loaded beyond their adaptive capacity. The original knee pain may then resolve or improve while the secondary sites become the dominant complaint, giving the clinical impression that the pain has migrated. In reality, new pain sources have been created by the biomechanical consequences of the original injury.

Clinical implication: A thorough assessment considers not only the current site of pain but the entire kinetic chain — how loading, posture, and movement patterns elsewhere in the body may be driving or maintaining the presenting complaint.

Central Sensitisation and Spreading Pain

In persistent pain states where central sensitisation has developed, the spread of pain beyond the original anatomical site is a recognised and well-documented feature. As the dorsal horn undergoes neuroplastic change, the receptive fields of central neurones expand — meaning they begin responding to input from a broader area of the body. Regions adjacent to, or even remote from, the original injury develop hypersensitivity. Allodynia and hyperalgesia spread outward.

This process underlies the progression of regional musculoskeletal pain to widespread pain in conditions such as fibromyalgia. It also explains the clinical observation that patients with longstanding pain frequently report pain in multiple body regions, with the distribution expanding over time. The movement of pain in these cases is not a sign of a new pathology in each affected area, but of a progressively sensitised central nervous system responding to broader and broader areas of the body as threatening.

Nerve Root and Radicular Pain

Compression or irritation of a spinal nerve root produces pain that follows the dermatomal distribution of that nerve — frequently perceived as burning, shooting, or radiating into a limb. As the position of the spine changes with movement, daily activity, or progressive degenerative change, the degree of nerve root compression fluctuates, causing radicular pain to shift in intensity and, sometimes, in precise distribution within the relevant dermatome. A person with L4–L5 disc herniation may notice that their leg pain shifts from the thigh to the shin and foot with different positions — reflecting changes in the mechanical relationship between the disc material and the nerve root.

What This Means for Assessment

The clinical significance of migrating or travelling pain is that its location alone provides limited information about its source. Systematic assessment — mapping the quality, behaviour, and aggravating and easing factors of the pain; testing joint mobility, muscle length, and neural mechanosensitivity; and evaluating posture and movement patterns throughout the kinetic chain — is required to identify the true driver. Treating only the current site of pain without identifying its source is a reliable recipe for temporary improvement followed by recurrence. Effective clinical reasoning asks not merely where the pain is, but why the pain-producing structures are under load.

References & Further Reading

  1. Travell JG, Simons DG. Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1983.
  2. Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L. Peripheral and central sensitisation in musculoskeletal pain disorders: an experimental approach. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2002;4(4):313–321.
  3. Woolf CJ. Central sensitisation: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain. 2011;152(3 Suppl):S2–15.
  4. Apkarian AV, et al. Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur J Pain. 2005;9(4):463–484.